Supreme Court Declares Public Safety is Paramount: Religious Structures on Roads Must Be Removed

DY365
DY365
Published: October 1,2024 01:39 PM
DY365

Story highlights

Supreme Court Declares Public Safety is Paramount: Religious Structures on Roads Must Be Removed

October 1, 2024: The Supreme Court of India underscored the importance of public safety in a landmark ruling today, asserting that any religious structures encroaching upon roads, water bodies, or railway tracks must be dismantled. The court emphasized the secular nature of the nation, stating that its directives for anti-encroachment drives would apply uniformly to all citizens, irrespective of their religious affiliations.



The ruling came during a hearing by a bench led by Justice BR Gavai and Justice KV Viswanathan, which addressed petitions challenging the controversial practice known as "bulldozer justice." This practice, gaining traction in several states, involves the demolition of properties owned by individuals accused of crimes, often without adequate notice or due process.



During the proceedings, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta represented the states of Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, and Madhya Pradesh. He clarified that being accused of a crime cannot justify bulldozer action against an individual, even in serious cases such as rape or terrorism. “It cannot be that the notice issued is stuck one day before; it has to be in advance,” he remarked, stressing the necessity of following proper municipal laws, which generally require prior notification before any demolition.



The bench further highlighted the need for a standardized system, suggesting the establishment of an online portal to ensure transparency and accessibility for citizens regarding demolition notices. “Once you digitize it, there is a record,” the judges noted, pointing to the importance of ensuring that all individuals are informed of any actions taken against their properties.



In a significant moment, the Solicitor General expressed concern that the court's directions may be perceived as targeting specific communities based on isolated incidents. The bench, however, maintained that the law must be applied uniformly, reiterating the principle that public safety is paramount in a diverse and secular society.